Florida Second DCA: Harrell v. State of Florida 2D2025-0591 Appeal Scheduled

• The Florida Second District Court of Appeal is reviewing the case of *Robert Anthony Harrell v. State of Florida*, identified by case number 2D2025-0591.
• Robert Anthony Harrell is the appellant, challenging a decision from the Circuit Court for Manatee County, where Judge Frederick P. Mercurio presided.
• The State of Florida is named as the appellee in this appeal, which has a significant date noted as September 9, 2026.
• Currently, no details regarding the underlying facts, specific legal issues, or the court's holding have been publicly disclosed.
• Without further information, the case offers no actionable legal implications for professionals at this time.

Consequently, at this preliminary stage, there are no actionable legal implications that can be drawn from this case.

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal is scheduled to review a case identified as *Robert Anthony Harrell v. State of Florida*, bearing the case number 2D2025-0591. A significant date associated with this appellate proceeding is September 9, 2026. In this action, Robert Anthony Harrell is designated as the appellant, indicating he is challenging a prior judicial decision, while the State of Florida is named as the appellee.

This appeal originates from the Circuit Court for Manatee County. The initial proceedings that led to this appellate review were presided over by Judge Frederick P. Mercurio. While the specific court, the parties involved, and the procedural origin are clear, the public record currently lacks details concerning the underlying facts of the dispute, the particular legal issues that form the basis of Mr. Harrell's appeal, or the specific relief being sought from the Second District Court of Appeal. The information available at this stage primarily serves to identify the case within the appellate docket.

Within Florida's judicial framework, circuit courts function as trial courts of general jurisdiction, handling a broad spectrum of legal matters, including both civil and criminal cases. Decisions rendered by these circuit courts are subject to review by the state's district courts of appeal. The Florida Second District Court of Appeal, in particular, exercises appellate jurisdiction over cases originating from circuit courts within its geographical purview, which includes Manatee County.

When an individual, such such as Robert Anthony Harrell, files an appeal as the appellant, they are formally requesting that the appellate court scrutinize the record of the lower court proceedings for any potential errors of law or fact that may have influenced the original judgment. Conversely, the State of Florida, as the appellee in this instance, will present arguments to uphold the decision made by the Manatee County Circuit Court. The appellate process is a fundamental component of the legal system, designed to ensure the correct application of legal principles and the preservation of due process. However, without access to the specific legal arguments or the factual background of the underlying case that led to this *Harrell v. State of Florida* appeal, the broader legal context remains general, encompassing any potential area of law that could be challenged from a circuit court ruling. The case number, 2D2025-0591, serves as its unique identifier within the appellate court's docket, and the September 9, 2026 date likely marks a scheduled event, such as a hearing, filing deadline, or the anticipated release of an opinion.

For legal professionals, including attorneys and compliance officers, the currently available public information regarding *Harrell v. State of Florida*, case number 2D2025-0591, provides very limited utility for immediate legal analysis or strategic advice. The reported details are confined to the case caption, the identities of the appellant and appellee, the specific appellate court, the originating trial court, and the presiding judge from the lower court, along with a future date associated with the appeal. Crucially, the underlying facts of the dispute, the precise legal issues presented for review, and any potential holding or judicial opinion from the Florida Second District Court of Appeal are entirely absent from the reported details.

Consequently, at this preliminary stage, there are no actionable legal implications that can be drawn from this case. Without understanding the substance of the appeal, lawyers cannot discern new legal precedents, identify emerging trends in Florida case law, or advise clients on potential impacts. The lack of specific details means that the case, as currently reported, functions primarily as a notification of ongoing litigation within the Florida Second District Court of Appeal, rather than a source of substantive legal guidance. Until further information, such as the court's opinion or detailed filings, becomes publicly available, its significance remains purely procedural.

This article provides only the case caption and future appeal date. Without details on the facts, issues, or holding, there is no actionable legal implication for a lawyer or compliance officer at this time.

Source: Based on official court docket information.