California Court of Appeal: Sujan v. UHS Corona E084185 Opinion Filed

• An appellate opinion in the case of *Sujan v. UHS Corona E084185* was filed on September 16, 2026.
• The opinion, issued by the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, is certified for publication.
• Both Sunil Sujan et al. and UHS Corona, Inc. et al. are listed as appellants in this legal proceeding.
• The appellate action stems from a prior case heard in the California Superior Court, identified by case number RIC1717505.
• Without the full text of the opinion, the specific legal issues, reasoning, or outcome of the appeal remain unknown.

The absence of the opinion's full text means that no specific practical implications for legal strategy, regulatory compliance, or business operations can be identified at this stage.

An appellate opinion in the matter of *Sujan v. UHS Corona E084185* was officially filed on September 16, 2026, marking a significant procedural development in this ongoing legal dispute. The case involves Sunil Sujan and other plaintiffs, who are identified as appellants, against UHS Corona, Inc. and other defendants, also appearing as appellants. This designation indicates that both sides have appealed aspects of a prior ruling, suggesting a complex legal battle that has now reached a higher judicial review.

The document, categorized simply as an "Opinion," originates from the California Court of Appeal, specifically within the Fourth Appellate District, Division Two. This court is a crucial part of California's judicial hierarchy, tasked with reviewing decisions made by lower trial courts. The appellate case number assigned to this particular proceeding is E084185, providing a unique identifier for tracking its progress and eventual resolution within the state's appellate system. The underlying action, which led to this appeal, was initially heard in the California Superior Court under case number RIC1717505.

The filing of an opinion by the California Court of Appeal signifies a critical juncture in the *Sujan v. UHS Corona* legal case. As an appellate court, the California Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, reviews the decisions of trial courts for legal errors. The fact that both the plaintiffs, Sunil Sujan et al., and the defendants, UHS Corona, Inc. et al., are listed as appellants underscores that the issues presented for review are multifaceted, with each party seeking to overturn or modify aspects of the lower court's judgment.

The appellate case number, E084185, specifically identifies this proceeding within the records of the California Court of Appeal. This number is distinct from the original trial court number, RIC1717505 California Superior Court, which corresponds to the case as it was heard at the trial level. The progression from a superior court action to an appellate review is a standard path for legal disputes in California, allowing for a thorough examination of legal principles and procedural adherence. The issuance of an opinion by the appellate court will ultimately provide guidance or a definitive ruling on the points of law raised by the appealing parties.

A key detail regarding the *Sujan v. UHS Corona California opinion* is its certification for publication. In California, not all appellate opinions are published; only those deemed to establish new rules of law, apply existing rules to new facts, or involve issues of public interest are typically certified. This certification means the opinion will serve as binding precedent for lower courts and can be cited in future legal arguments across the state. The decision to certify an opinion for publication is made by the appellate court itself, indicating that the legal issues addressed in *Sujan v. UHS Corona E084185* are considered significant enough to contribute to California's body of case law.

The published status elevates the importance of this particular ruling beyond the immediate parties involved. It signals that the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, has rendered a decision that will have broader implications for legal practitioners and potentially for similar cases in the future. Once the full text of the opinion becomes publicly available, legal professionals will be able to analyze its reasoning and holdings to understand its impact on relevant areas of law.

While the procedural details surrounding the filing of the *Sujan v. UHS Corona California opinion* are now established, including its filing date of September 16, 2026, and its appellate case number E084185, the substantive content of the opinion remains undisclosed in the provided information. The document is identified simply as an "Opinion," which is the standard designation for a court's written decision. However, without access to the full text of this opinion, the specific legal issues addressed, the court's reasoning, and the ultimate outcome of the appeal cannot be determined.

For legal professionals, compliance officers, and other interested parties, the current information serves primarily as a notification of a significant development in the *Sujan UHS Corona legal case*. The absence of the opinion's full text means that no specific practical implications for legal strategy, regulatory compliance, or business operations can be identified at this stage. The true impact of this ruling will only become clear once the detailed findings and conclusions of the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, are made public, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of its legal ramifications.

This article provides only the case caption and filing details for *Sujan v. UHS Corona*. Without the full opinion text, no specific practical implications for lawyers or compliance officers can be identified.

Source: Original reporting via court filing details