Full Statement: Bawumia’s address to the nation on Public Tribunals Bill

The former Vice-President of Ghana, Dr Mahamudu Bawumia, has made an appeal to President John Dramani Mahama regarding the Public Tribunals Bill, 2026. In a statement issued by Dr Bawumia, he urged the President not to assent to the bill and instead suspend the process for broad stakeholder consultations before making any final decision. This development highlights concerns surrounding the proposed legislation, which has sparked debate among various stakeholders in Ghana.

The Public Tribunals Bill, 2026, has been a subject of interest and controversy in Ghana's legal and political circles. The bill's passage through Parliament has led to calls for President John Dramani Mahama to either assent or veto the legislation. In this context, Dr Mahamudu Bawumia's appeal to the President not to assent to the bill is significant, as it underscores the need for further consultation and consideration before any final decision is taken. This article will examine the background of the Public Tribunals Bill, 2026, and the implications of Dr Bawumia's appeal.

The Public Tribunals Bill, 2026, was recently passed by Parliament in Ghana. The bill aims to establish public tribunals to address various issues, including corruption and administrative malpractices. However, the passage of the bill has been met with controversy, with some stakeholders expressing concerns about its potential impact on the country's governance structure. Dr Mahamudu Bawumia's appeal to President John Dramani Mahama is part of this broader debate, highlighting the need for careful consideration and consultation before any final decision is taken.

Dr Bawumia's appeal to President Mahama not to assent to the Public Tribunals Bill, 2026, raises important questions about the role of public tribunals in Ghana's governance structure. The bill's passage has sparked debate among various stakeholders, with some arguing that it is necessary to address corruption and administrative malpractices. However, others have expressed concerns about its potential impact on the country's institutions and the rule of law. Dr Bawumia's appeal underscores the need for careful consideration and consultation before any final decision is taken.

The outcome of this matter has not yet been reported. The implications of Dr Bawumia's appeal are significant, as they highlight the need for further consultation and consideration before any final decision is taken on the Public Tribunals Bill, 2026. Practitioners should closely monitor developments in this area, as they may have important implications for Ghana's governance structure and the rule of law.