Allahabad HC Stays Trial Against Yash Dayal in Rape Case

• Allahabad High Court stays trial against RCB bowler Yash Dayal accused of rape on false promise to marry.
• Dayal's petition seeks quashing of trial court order and pending proceedings under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).
• The cricketer argues that his relationship with the complainant was consensual, without any promise of marriage.
• The case may set a precedent for similar cases in the future, making it essential for lawyers to stay informed about Indian laws regarding false promises of marriage.

Dayal has also sought to quash the pending proceedings against him and the chargesheet filed by the police last month under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).

The Allahabad High Court has intervened in the trial against cricketer Yash Dayal, who is accused of rape on false promise of marriage. On Wednesday, Justice Sanjoy Kumar Pachori passed an order staying proceedings before the trial court. This decision comes after Dayal filed a petition seeking quashing of the trial court's order taking cognizance of the summons issued to him by a Ghaziabad magistrate.

Dayal has also sought to quash the pending proceedings against him and the chargesheet filed by the police last month under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). The cricketer's plea argues that his relationship with the complainant was consensual from the beginning, without any promise of marriage. He claims that her case at best could be a breach of promise to marry, rather than a false promise of marriage.

Dayal has played for Gujarat Titans and Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) in the Indian Premier League (IPL). Although he did not participate in the 2026 season, he remained on contract with the RCB. The cricketer was booked by Ghaziabad police in July 2025 after a woman complained that he had established physical relations with her on the false promise of marriage during their five-year relationship.

The case against Yash Dayal is significant because it involves allegations of rape on false promise of marriage. Under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), a woman can file a complaint if she believes that her partner has made a false promise of marriage to her. The law aims to protect women from exploitation and ensure they receive justice in cases where their partners have deceived them.

In this case, Dayal's lawyers argue that the relationship was consensual, and therefore, there is no basis for the charges filed against him. However, the complainant claims that she was promised marriage by Dayal, which he never intended to fulfill. The Allahabad High Court's decision to stay the trial proceedings may set a precedent for similar cases in the future.

The case highlights the importance of understanding the nuances of Indian law regarding false promises of marriage. Lawyers representing clients accused of rape on false promise to marry should pay close attention to the Allahabad High Court's ruling in Yash Dayal v State of UP, which may have far-reaching implications for similar cases.

The stay on trial proceedings against Yash Dayal has significant implications for the cricketing community and the broader public. The case raises questions about the responsibility of celebrities to uphold the law and respect the rights of others.

Moreover, the case highlights the need for greater awareness and understanding of Indian laws regarding false promises of marriage. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Section 69 is a crucial provision that aims to protect women from exploitation. However, its application can be complex, and lawyers must carefully navigate these cases to ensure justice is served.

The Allahabad High Court's decision may set a precedent for similar cases in the future, making it essential for lawyers and advocates to stay informed about the latest developments in this area of law.

Lawyers representing clients accused of rape on false promise to marry should watch for the Allahabad High Court's ruling in Yash Dayal v State of UP, which may set a precedent for similar cases.

Source: Original reporting via [Source Not Specified]