Lt. Gen Duop: SPLA-IO was not involved in Nasir attack

• Lt Gen Gabriel Duop Lam denies SPLA-IO involvement in Nasir attack
• Seven co-accused face charges including murder, conspiracy, terrorism, treason, destruction of public property, and crimes against humanity
• Prosecutors allege that SPLA-IO forces allied with the White Army killed 257 South Sudan People's Defence Forces (SSPDF) soldiers during an attack on the Nasir military garrison in March 2025
• Military equipment worth about 58 million US dollars was destroyed or seized
• The trial highlights the complexities of military command structures in South Sudan and the need for clear communication between commanders

Besides the division commanders, we also get security reports through our Military Intelligence officers in charge of the divisions.

The ongoing Nasir incident trial has taken a new turn with Lt Gen Gabriel Duop Lam, the fourth accused and former Deputy Chief of Defence Forces for Operations (integrated into SSPDF), denying allegations that SPLA-IO forces were responsible for the attack on the South Sudan Peoples Defense Forces (SSPDF) garrison in Nasir County, Upper Nile State, in March 2025. In a statement to the court, Lt Gen Duop maintained that the local armed youth, popularly known as the White Army, are armed civilians who operate independently and are not under the command of SPLA-IO. He also clarified that he is part of the army command and regularly receives operational reports from division commanders alongside the Chief of Defence Forces.

The case highlights the complexities of military command structures in South Sudan, where clear communication between commanders is crucial to prevent attacks on military garrisons. Lt Gen Duop's statement emphasizes that there is no difference between SSPDF command and himself, as they are part of the same command structure that receives field reports from division commanders. This raises questions about the accountability of military leaders in South Sudan and the need for clear communication protocols to prevent such incidents.

The Nasir incident trial has significant implications for military leaders and compliance officers, who should take note of the ongoing proceedings. The case highlights the importance of clear communication between commanders to prevent attacks on military garrisons. Lawyers and compliance officers should also be aware that the trial involves charges including murder, conspiracy, terrorism, treason, destruction of public property, and crimes against humanity, which may have far-reaching consequences for those involved.

Lawyers and compliance officers should watch for the ongoing Nasir incident trial, where seven co-accused face charges including murder, conspiracy, terrorism, treason, destruction of public property, and crimes against humanity. The case highlights the complexities of military command structures in South Sudan and the need for clear communication between commanders to prevent attacks on military garrisons.

Source: Original reporting via [Source]