Opposition Challenges Constitutional Amendment No. 3 in Constitutional Court, Seeks to Nullify Mnangagwa's Term Extension

The Opposition National Constitutional Assembly (NCA) has challenged Constitutional Amendment No. 3 in the Constitutional Court, seeking to nullify President Mnangagwa's term extension. The NCA argues that the amendment is unconstitutional and should be declared null and void. This development highlights the ongoing debate over presidential term limits in Zimbabwe.

Vhurande Mahlupeko, a member of the Opposition National Constitutional Assembly (NCA) National Executive Committee, has approached the Constitutional Court seeking an order to declare the recently enacted Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 3) Act, 2026 null and void. This move is in response to the amendment that extended President Mnangagwa's term in office. The NCA's challenge raises questions about the constitutionality of the amendment and its implications for the country's governance structure.

Constitutional Amendment No. 3 was enacted in 2026, allowing President Mnangagwa to serve an additional term beyond the two-term limit specified in the Constitution. The amendment has been met with opposition from various stakeholders, including the NCA, which argues that it is unconstitutional and undermines democratic principles. The Constitutional Court will now have to consider the merits of the NCA's challenge and determine whether the amendment complies with the Constitution.

The NCA's challenge highlights the ongoing debate over presidential term limits in Zimbabwe. The amendment has been criticized for undermining democratic principles and perpetuating a culture of authoritarianism. If the Constitutional Court upholds the NCA's challenge, it could have significant implications for the country's governance structure and the role of the President. However, if the court rejects the challenge, it would likely reinforce the current power dynamics in Zimbabwe.

The outcome of this matter has not yet been reported, but its implications are far-reaching. Practitioners should closely follow developments in this case, as it may set a precedent for future challenges to constitutional amendments in Zimbabwe. The NCA's challenge also underscores the need for robust democratic institutions and adherence to constitutional principles.