KURA Ngong Road Naivasha Flyover records: Constitutional Petition Seeks Disclosure

• A constitutional petition has been filed against KURA seeking disclosure of records related to the Ngong Road–Naivasha Flyover project.
• The petitioner argues that KURA's failure to respond to a request for information constitutes a violation of constitutional principles.
• The case may shape future enforcement of Kenyan access to information laws and underscore the importance of transparency in public infrastructure development.

The petition argues that KURA's conduct frustrates the public's ability to monitor how taxpayers' money is being utilized, thereby violating constitutional principles.

A constitutional petition has been filed against the Kenya Urban Roads Authority (KURA) by governance advocate Francis Awino, seeking disclosure of records related to the Ngong Road–Naivasha Flyover project, which was completed and commissioned in June 2026. The petition argues that KURA's failure to respond to a request for information submitted on June 19, 2026, constitutes a violation of the constitutional principles of openness and accountability. Awino maintains that the public has a right to scrutinize the project, given its financing with public funds, and that documentation should be available for public inspection.

The documents sought by the petitioner include the approved budget, procurement records, tender documents, bid evaluation reports, contracts, payments made to contractors and consultants, implementation timelines, variation orders, inspection reports, audit reports, and expenditure statements. KURA is accused of failing to supply the requested information or provide a legal justification for declining the request within the prescribed period.

The petition cites several articles of the Kenyan Constitution, including Articles 10, 35, 47, 73, 201, and 232. These provisions emphasize the importance of openness, accountability, and good governance in public institutions. The Access to Information Act is also referenced, highlighting KURA's legal duty to facilitate access to information and uphold transparency in the management of public resources. The petition argues that KURA's conduct frustrates the public's ability to monitor how taxpayers' money is being utilized, thereby violating constitutional principles.

The case has significant implications for public institutions' disclosure obligations under Kenyan access to information laws, particularly in relation to taxpayer-funded projects. It may shape future enforcement of these laws and underscore the importance of transparency in public infrastructure development.

This constitutional petition has far-reaching implications for public institutions in Kenya. If successful, it could establish a precedent for greater transparency in taxpayer-funded projects, ensuring that citizens have access to information about how their money is being spent. The case also highlights the importance of compliance with access to information laws and the potential consequences of non-compliance. Lawyers and compliance officers should take note of this development, as it may inform future enforcement of Kenyan access to information laws.

Lawyers and compliance officers should watch for the potential implications of this case on public institutions' disclosure obligations under Kenyan access to information laws, particularly in relation to taxpayer-funded projects.

Source: Original reporting via [Source Title]