CJI Surya Kant Mutes Virtual Link Audio During Mentioning in Supreme Court

• Chief Justice of India Surya Kant muted virtual link audio during morning case mentioning in Courtroom No. 1.
• The muting occurred as lawyers were mentioning urgent cases before the CJI, who evaluates their urgency and decides whether to assign a hearing date or deny immediate listing.
• CJI Surya Kant has previously observed that mentioning is an 'administrative and housekeeping' exercise rather than a judicial proceeding.
• This stance may impact lawyers' strategies for seeking urgent listings or reporting on court proceedings.

The muting of the audio occurred today days after CJI Surya Kant observed that mentioning of urgent matters is an 'administrative and housekeeping' exercise rather than a judicial proceeding.

In a significant development, Chief Justice of India Surya Kant muted the virtual link audio during morning case mentioning in Courtroom No. 1 on [date]. This marked the first time since hybrid hearings began in the Supreme Court that the audio was muted during mentioning. The muting occurred as lawyers were mentioning urgent cases before the CJI, who evaluates their urgency and decides whether to assign a hearing date or deny immediate listing.

The morning case mentioning is a daily ritual that takes place after the Bench assembles at 10:30 AM and lasts for around 10-15 minutes. During this time, the CJI delivers brief oral observations on each matter mentioned before him.

The muting of audio during mentioning has sparked renewed attention to the CJI's recent remarks on the procedure. In a previous hearing, CJI Surya Kant observed that mentioning is an 'administrative and housekeeping' exercise rather than a judicial proceeding. This stance may impact lawyers' strategies for seeking urgent listings or reporting on court proceedings.

The Supreme Court has been conducting hybrid hearings since [year], allowing lawyers to participate remotely through virtual links. However, the CJI's decision to mute audio during mentioning suggests that certain aspects of these proceedings remain subject to administrative discretion.

The Chief Justice of India's explicit statement on mentioning has significant implications for lawyers and court reporters. As CJI Surya Kant emphasized, mentioning is an administrative exercise rather than a judicial proceeding. This distinction may lead to changes in how lawyers approach urgent listings and reporting on court proceedings.

Lawyers should be aware that the CJI's stance on mentioning may impact their strategy for seeking urgent listings or reporting on court proceedings. The Supreme Court's hybrid hearings have introduced new complexities, and the muting of audio during mentioning highlights the need for clarity on administrative procedures.

Lawyers should be aware that the Chief Justice of India, Surya Kant, has now explicitly stated that mentioning is an administrative exercise and not a judicial proceeding, which may impact their strategy for seeking urgent listings or reporting on court proceedings.

Source: Original reporting via [Source Name]